The Constitutional Revivalist's Handbook
Powerful information every Citizen must arm themselves with if we are to shift the tides of iniquity in the United States of America.
Disclaimer: Views expressed belong to the people asserting them. This is not a substitute for legal advice. Information is considered use-at-own-risk. Please consult a legal professional before taking action.
A Preamble to Constitutional Revivalism…
The United States of America was founded on the principles of liberty, justice, and the rule of law. These ideals were enshrined in the Constitution of the United States, which has served as a beacon of hope and inspiration for millions of people around the world.
However, in recent years, it has become increasingly clear that these ideals are under attack. The BAR Association, created and controlled by banksters, now control our judicial system. They have corporatized our government at every level, and they control our legislators, financial system, and even our press and media.
This control has allowed them to rob our gold and silver, destroy our manufacturing base, tax us into submission, and drive us into a debt from which it is impossible to recover. They have taken control of our families, education, and even our churches, and they spy on us, track us, and license our liberties.
But we can fight back. By taking back our courts, we will take back everything. We will reset the clock to 1789 and introduce the corrupt "powers that be" to the righteous power of justice.
It has become increasingly clear that God has a place in the law, and that He sits at the top of it. Revivalism, both in faith and constitutionality, is truly at the heart of what is needed in American society today.
Through powerful facts and citations, we can show the people that we must step back into our power and collectively call God and the Supreme and common Law back into form. We must drive out the agents of iniquity and deliver America back into one nation, under God, with liberty and justice for all.
As John Adams once said, "We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion... Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other."
The United States was founded on the principles of liberty, justice, and a government of the people, by the people, and for the people. However, in recent times, these principles have been eroded by powerful interests that have taken control of our government, our financial system, and even our courts. This has led to a loss of our individual rights and freedoms, as well as the consolidation of power in the hands of a few.
It is time for a Constitutional Revivalism, a movement that will restore the principles that our nation was founded upon. We must recognize that God has a place in the law, and that He sits at the top of it. As our Founding Fathers understood, the rights of the people come from God, not the government.
In order to restore our Constitution, we must take back control of our courts, which have been co-opted by powerful interests. The People, by and through their County Sheriffs, have the power and authority to stand against and control any and all federal agencies. The county sheriff is the highest law enforcement officer in the land, and has the power to protect the people against unconstitutional actions by the federal government.
We must also recognize the importance of a free and independent press, one that is not controlled by powerful interests. As Thomas Jefferson said, "the only security of all is in a free press." However, our press has been consolidated into the hands of a few, and has become little more than a mouthpiece for powerful interests.
We must take back our education system, which has been used to indoctrinate our children with false narratives and propaganda. As Abraham Lincoln said, "The philosophy of the school room in one generation will be the philosophy of government in the next."
We must also take back our financial system, which has been used to enrich the few at the expense of the many. As Andrew Jackson said, "Gentlemen, I have had men watching you for a long time and I am convinced that you have used the funds of the bank to speculate in the breadstuffs of the country. When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when you lost, you charged it to the bank. You tell me that if I take the deposits from the bank and annul its charter, I shall ruin ten thousand families. That may be true, gentlemen, but that is your sin! Should I let you go on, you will ruin fifty thousand families, and that would be my sin! You are a den of vipers and thieves."
We must also take back our manufacturing base, which has been outsourced to foreign countries at the expense of American workers. As Henry Ford said, "It is well that the people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning."
It is time for a Constitutional Revivalism, a movement that will restore the principles that our nation was founded upon. It is time for the people to step back into their power, and collectively call God and the Supreme and common Law back into form, to drive out the agents of iniquity, and deliver America back into one nation, under God, with liberty and justice for all.
-@EsquireJuris, Founder of @PoliticsGuilded
Sources:
The Constitution of the United States of America
John Adams, "Address to the Military," October 11, 1798
Thomas Paine, "Common Sense," 1776
The Federalist Papers, particularly Federalist No. 51 and No. 78.
Detailed review of the power of the Constitutional Sheriff (webPDF)
Carl Miller Esq.
Introducing Carl Miller, an esteemed expert on the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights, with over 25 years of experience in the legal field and a win-loss rate of over 90%. But Carl is more than just a legal mind; he is also a highly decorated hero of the Vietnam War, having served in the elite Apache Troop both as a paratrooper and crew chief. His true-life experiences inspired the famous movie "Apocalypse Now" and the best-selling book "Apache Sunrise."
Carl's commitment to service did not end with his military career. He was inducted into the top-secret project "Blue Book" and served in several operations supporting Lt. Col. James "Bo" Gritz, including Operation "Eagle Snatch." Carl has endured hundreds of dangerous parachute jumps, broken his legs or ankles six times, and been shot down four times. Yet, he credits divine intervention and God's providence for preserving his life, so he may fulfill his mission of teaching others about the importance of the United States Constitution and preserving it for future generations.
With Carl Miller as your mentor and teacher, you will have the knowledge and tools to assert your rights in any situation. Whether you're facing a traffic ticket, tax dispute, or any other legal matter, Carl is the best in the business. His dedication to constitutional revivalism and his unique perspective on the law make him an invaluable resource for anyone seeking to understand and utilize their rights under the law.
Join Carl Miller on this journey of rediscovery and empowerment, as we learn to uphold the Constitution and defend our liberties. With Carl's guidance, you will be well-equipped to navigate the complex legal landscape and emerge victorious in any legal battle.
Know Your Constitution with Carl Miller
Resources
The Text Workbook - Carl-Miller-Law-Study.pdf (youarelaw.org)
The Brief - Constitutional Law (freedomschool.us)
KrisAnne Hall JD
KrisAnne Hall is a true champion of the Constitution and a fearless defender of liberty. As a former prosecutor, KrisAnne has seen firsthand the ways in which our fundamental rights can be threatened by those in power. She was fired from her job for simply teaching the Constitution to TEA Party groups, refusing to compromise her principles for a paycheck.
But KrisAnne did not let that setback stop her. Instead, she has dedicated her life to traveling the country and teaching others about the Constitution and the history that inspired it. Her passion and knowledge are unmatched, and she has a remarkable ability to explain complex legal concepts in a way that anyone can understand.
In addition to her legal expertise, KrisAnne is also a disabled veteran of the US Army and a former Russian linguist. She received her undergraduate degree in Bio-Chemistry from Blackburn College in 1991 before going on to earn her J.D. from the University of Florida, Levin College of Law.
KrisAnne has been recognized for her tireless advocacy for liberty and the Constitution. She has been awarded the Freedom Fighter award by Americans for Prosperity, the Certificate of Achievement from the Sons of the Revolution for her defense of Liberty, and the Congressman James Blair Award for Defending the Constitution.
With KrisAnne Hall as a mentor and teacher, anyone can learn to understand and defend the Constitution, and be inspired to protect our fundamental rights for generations to come.
The Constitution with KrisAnne Hall JD
Resources
Noncompliant, a Documentary Film (KrisAnneHall.com)
Liberty First University (libertyfirstsociety.com)
The Power of the Constitutional Sheriff (YouTube)
Right To Refuse Vaccination (KrisAnneHall.com)
SPLC wrote this failed hit-piece against KrisAnne, which ended up making her sound like a pretty good candidate for office instead! (splcenter.org)
Dr. David Champion PhD
Dave Champion is a man of many hats - a former Army Ranger, law enforcement officer, businessman, journalist, and public speaker. His extensive background in legal studies and constitutional law has made him a sought-after consultant on state and federal regulatory matters. In addition, Dave holds a doctoral degree in Political Philosophy and is a physiologist, which has allowed him to share his expertise on a wide range of topics.
As a journalist, Dave hosted his own radio and television shows for almost two decades. His focus was always on educating the public about their rights and freedoms under the Constitution. He is a passionate advocate for the 2nd Amendment, the 14th Amendment, and limited government, and he has lectured extensively on these subjects.
Dave's expertise in self-defense and martial arts has also made him a respected instructor in the field of firearms, tactics, and use-of-force. He has trained law enforcement officers, military personnel, and civilians on how to properly handle and use firearms for self-defense.
Throughout his career, Dave has received numerous awards and accolades for his work, including the "Defender of the Bill of Rights" award from the American Freedom Law Center and the "Champion of Liberty" award from the Campaign for Liberty. His dedication to defending and upholding the Constitution has inspired many to become more knowledgeable and active in protecting their rights.
Income Tax - Shattering the Myths
Resources
Dave gives evidence the income tax doesn't apply to YOU! (bitchute.com)
DrReality.news (Dave's website)
Income Tax: Shattering the Myths (Dave’s book)
ITSTM, Author Dave Champion Explains (youtube.com)
Dave's Amazon reviews on ITSTM [4.4/5] (amazon.com)
The Power to Tax, is the Power to Destroy (National Center for Constitutional Studies)
Proof that the IRS operates under foreign treaty….
IRS Agents confirm that you are not required to pay income tax. (rumble.com)
More Evidence of the Gov.'s Income Tax Scam (rumble.com)
Carl Miller's Brief on Taxation (Cupdf.com)
How do we regain control?
(by learning from history)
When we seek to regain control, it is important to learn from history. The Battle of Athens (1946), also known as the "McMinn County War," serves as an inspiring example of a rebellion against corrupt local government.
The political machine in McMinn County, Tennessee, had long been controlled by a small group of powerful politicians who employed fraud and intimidation to maintain their grip on power. During the 1946 elections, the machine went even further, blatantly rigging the polls and even holding poll watchers at gunpoint.
In response, a group of World War II veterans, led by former Army Captain Tom Gillespie, decided to take action. They formed the "G.I. Non-Partisan League" and ran a slate of candidates against the machine in the local elections. When their victory was stolen from them through fraud, they armed themselves and laid siege to the local jail, where the corrupt officials were holed up with the ballot boxes.
After a tense standoff, the veterans successfully stormed the jail and retrieved the ballots, allowing the will of the people to be properly counted. The Battle of Athens became a symbol of resistance against corruption and tyranny, and a reminder that ordinary citizens have the power to take back their government.
As we seek to regain control in our own times, we can draw inspiration from the courage and determination of these veterans. By standing up against corruption and fighting for the principles of democracy and the rule of law, we too can make a difference.
Sources:
"The Battle of Athens: When the GI’s Stood Up Against Corruption" by Evan Andrews, History.com
"The Battle of Athens: Restoring the Rule of Law" by John T. McNabb II, American Thinker
Learn about it here, or watch the film below!
What is a 'right'?
According to Blackstone…
'right', In Constitutional Law,
This classification of rights comes from the legal and political philosophy of William Blackstone, an 18th-century English jurist. Blackstone wrote extensively on the concept of natural law, which he believed underpinned the English common law and the rights and liberties of Englishmen.
In his Commentaries on the Laws of England, Blackstone distinguished between absolute and relative rights. Absolute rights are those that belong to individuals simply by virtue of their existence as human beings, such as the right to life, liberty, and property. These rights are inherent and cannot be taken away or abridged by the government.
Relative rights, on the other hand, are those that arise from an individual's membership in society and their relationships with others. These include rights such as the right to free speech, the right to vote, and the right to a fair trial. While these rights are still important, they are not absolute and can be limited by the government in certain circumstances.
Blackstone's classification of rights has had a significant impact on the development of modern constitutional law and human rights. It emphasizes the importance of protecting individual liberty while recognizing that rights must be balanced against the needs of society as a whole.
"There is also a classification of rights, with respect to the constitution of civil society. Thus, 'the rights of persons, considered in their natural capacities, are of two sorts, - absolute and relative ; absolute, which are such as appertain and belong to particular men, merely as individuals or single persons; relative, which are incident to them as members of society, and standing in various relations to each other.'
Rights are also classified in constitutional law as natural, civil, and political , to which there is sometimes added the class of 'personal rights'.
Natural rights are those which grow out of the nature of man and depend upon personality, as distinguished from such as are created by law and depend upon civilized society; or they are those which are plainly assured by natural law; or those which, by fair deduction from the present physical, moral, social, and religious characteristics of man, he must be invested with, and which he ought to have realized for him in a jural society, in order to fulfill the ends to which his nature calls him.
Civil rights are such as belong to every citizen of the state or country, or, in a wider sense, to all its inhabitants, and are not connected with the organization or administration of government. They include the rights of property, marriage, protection by the laws, freedom of contact, trial by jury, etc. Or, as otherwise defined, civil rights are rights appertaining to a person in virtue of his citizenship in a state or community. Rights capable of being enforced or redressed in a civil action. Also a term applied to certain rights secured to citizens of the United States by the 13th and 14th amendments to the constitution, and by various acts of congress made in pursuance thereof.
Political rights consist in the power to participate, directly or indirectly, in the establishment of administration of government, such as the right of citizenship, that of suffrage, the right to hold public office, and the right of petition."
Natural Law, God’s Jurisdiction?
With respect to Black’s Law Dictionary, Natural Rights are ‘distinguished
from such as are created by law and depend upon civilized society; or they are those which are plainly assured by natural law;’
The influence of natural law, derived from religious and philosophical sources, on American law has been the subject of much debate. While the U.S. Constitution establishes the law as the supreme authority, the concept of divine natural law continues to play a role in legal decisions. This article aims to explore the history of natural law in American law and the current state of its influence.
Natural law refers to the idea that certain rights and principles are inherent in nature and are not created by human law. These rights are often traced back to religious or philosophical sources, such as the Bible or the writings of John Locke. The Founding Fathers of the United States were deeply influenced by natural law, and it played a significant role in the development of American law.
The U.S. Constitution established the law as the supreme authority and prohibited the government from establishing a religion. However, state and federal courts have occasionally referred to divine natural law in their decisions. For example, in Edwards v. Aguillard, the Supreme Court acknowledged the Founding Fathers' belief that inalienable rights of man were rooted in God. In McIlvaine v. Coxe's Lessee, the Supreme Court relied on the Bible as proof that expatriation had long been practiced and approved.
Despite the influence of natural law, religious and philosophical sources do not ordinarily form the express basis of judicial decisions. Many legal disputes are still decided in accordance with unwritten legal principles that are derived from secular political philosophy.
Memorandum of Law:
The concept of natural law has played a significant role in American law, both historically and in contemporary legal decisions. While the U.S. Constitution established the law as the supreme authority, the influence of divine natural law continues to be felt in state and federal courts.
The Supreme Court has recognized the importance of natural law principles, acknowledging that inalienable rights are rooted in God. However, religious and philosophical sources do not ordinarily form the express basis of judicial decisions. Instead, legal disputes are often decided in accordance with unwritten legal principles derived from secular political philosophy.
In the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson, borrowing from Locke, wrote that "all men are created equal … and are endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights … [including] life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." Jefferson identified the freedom of thought as one of the inalienable rights when he said, "Almighty God has created the mind free, and manifested his supreme will that free it shall remain by making it altogether insusceptible of restraint." In Powell v. Pennsylvania, 127 U.S. 678, 8 S. Ct. 1257, 32 L. Ed. 253 (1888), the Supreme Court recognized the importance of the divine influence in early U.S. law, stating that the "right to pursue happiness is placed by the Declaration of Independence among the inalienable rights of man, not by the grace of emperors or kings, or by the force of legislative or constitutional enactments, but by the Creator."
The U.S. Constitution altered the relationship between law and religion. Article VI establishes the Constitution as the supreme law of the land. The First Amendment prohibits the government from establishing a religion, which means that a law may not advance one religion at the expense of another or prefer a general belief in religion to irreligion, atheism, or agnosticism. Although the Supremacy and Establishment Clauses seemingly preclude the judiciary from grounding a decision on Scripture or religious doctrine, state and federal courts have occasionally referred to various sources of divine natural law.
For example, in Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578, 107 S. Ct. 2573, 96 L. Ed. 2d 510 (1987), the Supreme Court said that "the Founding Fathers believed devotedly that there was a God and that the inalienable rights of man were rooted in Him." In McIlvaine v. Coxe's Lessee, 6 U.S. 280, 2 Cranch 280, 2 L. Ed. 279 (1805), the Supreme Court relied on the Bible as "ancient and venerable" proof that expatriation had long been "practiced, approved, and never restrained."
Confronted with the question as to whether the conveyance of a particular piece of land was legally enforceable, the Supreme Court stated that it would consider "those principles of abstract justice, which the Creator of all things has impressed on the mind of his creature man, and which are admitted to regulate, in a great degree, the rights of civilized nations" (Johnson v. M'Intosh, 21 U.S. 543, 8 Wheat. 543, 5 L. Ed. 681 [1823]). In dred scott v. sandford, 60 U.S. 393, 19 How. 393, 15 L. Ed. 691 (1856), the Supreme Court held that slaves were the property of their owners and were not entitled to any constitutional protection. In a dissenting opinion, however, Justice John McLean wrote that a "slave is not mere chattel. He bears the impress of his Maker, and is amenable to the laws of God and man."
In the later twentieth century (in a judgment overturned in Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S., 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508 [2003]), the Supreme Court relied on Judeo-Christian standards as evidence that homosexual Sodomy is a practice not worthy of constitutional protection because it has been condemned throughout the history of western civilization (Bowers v. Hard-wick, 478 U.S. 186, 106 S. Ct. 2841, 92 L. Ed. 2d 140 [1986] [Burger, J., concurring]). State and federal courts also have considered Judeo-Christian standards when evaluating the constitutionality of statutes prohibiting bigamy and Incest. For example, Benton v. State, 265 Ga. 648, 461 S.E.2d 202 (1995), upheld the constitutionality of a Georgia statute prohibiting incest.
Despite the sprinkling of cases that have referred to Scripture, religious doctrine, and Judeo-Christian heritage, such sources of divine natural law do not ordinarily form the express basis of judicial decisions. At the same time, it cannot be said that state and federal courts have completely eliminated any reliance on natural law principles. To the contrary, many controversial legal disputes are still decided in accordance with unwritten legal principles that are derived not from religion, but from secular political philosophy.
COMMON LAW, LAW OF THE LAND
America was built upon God’s Law which is called “Natural Law” or “Common Law”. AT LAW, Blacks 4th: This phrase is used to point out that a thing is to be done according to the course of the common law; it is distinguished from a proceeding in equity.
THE LAWS OF NATURE AND OF NATURE'S GOD - “When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them … We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. Declaration of Independence U.S. Constitution Article III Section 2: “The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law...”
“The common law is the real law, the Supreme Law of the land, the code, rules, regulations, policy and statutes are “not the law.” Self v. Rhay, 61 Wn (2d) 261 “Common law as distinguished from law created by the enactment of legislatures, the common law comprises the body of those principles and rules of action, relating to the government and security of persons and property, which derive their authority solely from usages and customs of immemorial antiquity, or from the judgments and decrees of the courts recognizing, affirming, and enforcing such usages and customs; and, in this sense, particularly the ancient unwritten law of England.” 1 Kent, Comm. 492 Western Union Tel. Co. v. Call Pub. Co., 21 S.Ct. 561, 181 U.S. 92, 45 L.Ed. 765; Barry v. Port Jervis, 72 N.Y.S. 104, 64 App. Div. 268; U. S. v. Miller, D.C.Wash., 236 F. 798, 800.
"As to the construction, with reference to Common Law, an important cannon of construction is that constitutions must be construed to reference to the Common Law." The Common Law, so permitted destruction of the abatement of nuisances by summary proceedings and it was never supposed that a constitutional provision was intended to interfere with this established principle and although there is no common law of the United States in a sense of a national customary law as distinguished from the common law of England, adopted in the several states. In interpreting the Federal Constitution, recourse may still be had to the aid of the Common Law of England. It has been said that without reference to the common law, the language of the Federal Constitution could not be understood." 16Am Jur 2d., Sec. 114.
U.S. Constitution Article VI Clause 2: "This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding."
THE FOUNDATION OF GOD’S LAW is found in Mathew 22:35-40- “Then one of them, which was a lawyer, asked him a question, tempting him, and saying, Master, which is the great commandment in the law? Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.”
We the People empowered the Legislative Branch to write codes and statutes to control money, commerce, naturalization, bankruptcies, counterfeiting, law of the sea, etc. U.S. Constitution Article I Section 6 and 9. We the People did “NOT” give Congress power to write codes and statutes to control the behavior of We the People. We the People are the master Congress are our servants. To legislate We the Peoples’ behavior is to rule over the People, servants do not rule over the People.
The BAR teaches lawyers that the Common Law has been abrogated and lawyers advise all elected servants that the Common Law has been abrogated and that is advocating the overthrow the “Law of the Land” which is the overthrow of the United States of America in violation of 18 USC §2385 Advocating overthrow of Government: “Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof…”
Wherefore ‘inalienable rights’
According to Mr. Thomas Jefferson, it is a self-evident truth (or, if you prefer: a “sacred and undeniable truth”) that the People “are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness,”
This is one of the most memorable and yet controversial statements in English prose. Memorable it has become due to its striking simplicity. Controversial? It shouldn’t be. Jefferson is writing to the Americans of 1776; but his words also apply to Americans of today.
Understanding Your Rights:
The Role of God and the Constitution
It is often said that knowledge is power, and nowhere is this truer than when it comes to knowing your rights. Without a clear understanding of your rights, you may find yourself vulnerable to exploitation, oppression, or injustice. In fact, as the saying goes, if you don’t know your rights, you don’t have any rights.
But where do these rights come from? According to many, including those who drafted the United States Constitution, they come from God. As the preamble to the Constitution makes clear, one of the primary purposes of this document is to "secure the blessings of liberty" for ourselves and our posterity.
It is worth noting that this idea of God-given rights has a long history in Western thought. In the Christian tradition, for example, it is believed that all humans are created in the image of God and therefore have inherent dignity and worth. This idea is reflected in the Declaration of Independence, which famously states that "all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
Of course, not everyone believes in God or subscribes to the idea of God-given rights. But even for those who do not, there is still value in understanding the historical and philosophical roots of this concept. It speaks to the idea that our rights are not something that can be given or taken away by a government or any other external force. Rather, they are an essential part of who we are as human beings.
But while the Constitution recognizes the importance of these God-given rights, it also acknowledges that they need to be protected and secured through a legitimate program. That program, of course, is the Constitution itself. By laying out the framework for how our government should function and the rights and protections that it must afford to its citizens, the Constitution serves as a bulwark against tyranny and injustice.
It is worth noting that many of the principles and values enshrined in the Constitution are derived from the Bible. For example, the idea of limited government and the separation of powers can be traced back to the Old Testament book of Isaiah, which declares that "the government shall be upon his shoulder" (Isaiah 9:6). Similarly, the concept of individual rights and the importance of the rule of law can be found throughout the Bible.
But while the Constitution draws on these timeless principles, it is also a document that is adaptable to changing times and circumstances. As the world has changed over the past 200-plus years, so too has the interpretation and application of the Constitution. This is why we have amendments like the 14th, which guarantees equal protection under the law, and the 19th, which grants women the right to vote.
Ultimately, the Constitution is a document that is designed to protect the rights of all individuals, regardless of their background or station in life. As long as we recognize the fundamental principle that we must not infringe on the rights of others, we can all live as kings and queens in our own right, enjoying the blessings of liberty and justice for ourselves and our posterity.
-Carl Miller
Contracts & Statute of Frauds
“Now the facts are simple: if you don’t know your rights, you don’t have any rights-…The whole purpose of this is that you understand that these rights come from God. They are God inspired. God is the one who endowed you with these rights, and the constitution merely offers a legitimate program to protect those rights or to secure those rights and the blessings of those rights for ourselves and on our children for all times.
It’s important that you understand that the constitution God inspired, it’s important that you understand that a lot of the principles that are in the constitution actually come out of the Holy Bible, and it’s very important that you understand that this constitution allows you each to be a king or queen in your own right, as long as you recognize one principle that you don’t ever create a situation where you take away the rights of another.
So the whole point of having the constitution is so that all of us can have these rights equally. As long as we respect our neighbor and allow them also to have the rights equally, the protections are going to last forever.’
‘It’s important that you understand that the constitution is in writing, It’s important that you understand that it’s a legal document, that it was ratified by all of the members in congress together, and that document has all the signatures on the document, and it’s important that you understand that there was an offer: the government offered to govern. There was a consideration; the citizens considered how they were to be governed, and government promised that they would govern by constitution. And there was an agreement. The citizens agreed that if government promised that there would be government by constitution they would allow the constitution into force.
Now there’s a unique situation in force here: It’s very rare when you find the party of the first part, which is the congressmen, officers of the government, who are also parties of the second part as representatives of we the people of the republic. When they signed the document, they signed as officers of the government agreeing to the constitution, and simultaneously as officers and representatives of the people in the Republican form of government. When they signed that document that constituted an iron-clad contract in writing enforceable in a court of law, pursuant to the statute of frauds.
Now, all we ask is that they enforce the contract. If we read something in the constitution, and we have a good reason to believe it is the way it is, then they should honor that. And they should honor it in favor of you, the clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary.
The first thing you need to understand is Article 6 paragraph 2 of the constitution. This is known as the supremacy clause of the constitution. Basically what it says is “This constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made pursuance thereof, and the treaties made or which shall be made under the authority of the United States shall be the supreme law of the land. The judges in every state shall be bound thereby. Anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary are not withstanding in law.
First important case: Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803). This is one of the leading cases in the history of the U.S. The opinion of the court was “Anything that is in conflict is null and void of law; Clearly for a secondary law to come in conflict with the supreme was illogical; for certainly the supreme law would prevail over any other law, and certainly our forefathers had intended that the supreme law would be the basis for all laws, and for any law to come in conflict would be null and void of law. It would bear no power to enforce, it would bear no obligation to obey, it would purport to settle as though it had never existed, for unconstitutionality would date from the enactment of such a law, not from the date so branded by a court of law. No courts are bound to uphold it, and no citizens are bound to obey it, It operates as a mere nullity or a fiction of law, which means it doesn’t exist in law.” ’
-Carl Miller Esq.
Title 18 U.S.C. Deprivation of Rights?
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 Conspiracy Against Rights
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
UNITED STATES CODE, TITLE 42, SECTION 1983
Title 18 U.S.C., Section 241 makes it illegal for two or more people to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate someone in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to them by the Constitution or laws of the United States. It also prohibits people from going in disguise on the highway or on someone else's property with the intent to prevent or hinder their free exercise or enjoyment of any rights so secured. The punishment for violating this statute can result in a fine or imprisonment of up to ten years, or both. If such acts include kidnapping, attempted kidnapping, aggravated sexual abuse, attempted aggravated sexual abuse, or attempted murder, the offender may be fined, imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or sentenced to death.
Title 18 U.S.C., Section 242 makes it illegal for any person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom to willfully deprive or cause to be deprived from any person those rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the United States. This law further prohibits a person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom to willfully subject or cause to be subjected any person to different punishments, pains, or penalties than those prescribed for punishment of citizens on account of such person being an alien or by reason of his/her color or race. Acts under "color of any law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within the bounds or limits of their lawful authority but also acts done without and beyond the bounds of their lawful authority. Punishment for violating this statute can result in a fine or imprisonment of up to one year, or both. If bodily injury results or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, the offender may be fined, imprisoned up to ten years, or both. If death results, or if such acts include kidnapping, attempted kidnapping, aggravated sexual abuse, attempted aggravated sexual abuse, or attempted murder, the offender may be fined, imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or sentenced to death.
Additionally, Title 42 U.S.C., Section 1983 provides a civil remedy for individuals whose rights have been violated under color of law. This statute allows any person who has been deprived of their rights under the Constitution and laws of the United States to file a lawsuit against the individual or entity responsible for the violation. The statute applies to any person acting under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage of any State or Territory. The person responsible for the violation can be held liable in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress.
Judicial review paints a clear picture…
Statutes, codes, and regulations are often thought of as “the law,” but legal experts disagree. Black’s Law Dictionary, the preeminent legal reference, defines a statute as “the writing will of the legislature solemnly expressed according to the forms prescribed in the constitution; an act of the legislature.” However, in Flournoy v. First National Bank of Shreveport, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that a statute is not a law. Similarly, in In Re Self v. Rhay, the Washington Supreme Court held that a code is not a law.
Furthermore, U.S. Supreme Court decisions have emphasized that the common law is the real law and that codes, rules, regulations, policy, and statutes are not. For example, in Self v. Rhay, the Court held that the common law is the Supreme Law of the land, and in Miranda v. Arizona, the Court held that no legislation or rule-making can abrogate rights secured by the Constitution.
Interestingly, the U.S. Supreme Court also held in Cruden v. Neale that every man in America is independent of all laws except those prescribed by nature and that institutions formed by fellow humans without a person’s consent do not bind them.
Despite this, many citizens are misled into thinking that statutes and codes are the law because of their respect for authority. In United States v. Minker, the Court warned that deceptive practices in administrative state courts can coerce citizens into waiving their rights due to ignorance.
It’s also worth noting that the Court has held that no state can convert a liberty into a license and charge a fee for it, and if a state does convert a right into a privilege, a citizen can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right with impunity.
In conclusion, while statutes, codes, and regulations may be the law of government for internal regulation, they are not the law of man in his separate but equal station and natural state. The common law remains the real law and the Supreme Law of the land.
STATUTE. Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition. The writing will of the legislature solemnly expressed according to the forms prescribed in the constitution; an act of the legislature.
A “STATUTE” is NOT a law! – Flournoy v. First National Bank of Shreveport, 197 LA 1057-3 So. 2d 244,248.
A “CODE” in NOT a law! – In Re Self v. Rhay, Wn 2d 261
A concurrent or “joint resolution of the legislature is NOT “law”. Knowing v. Flynn, 258 N.Y. 292,179 N.E. 705,707, Ward v. State, 176 OKL,368,56 P. 2d 136,137; State ex rel. Todd v. Yelle, 7 Wash. 2d 43, 110.P.2d 162,165.
U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION – “The common law is the real law, the Supreme Law of the land, the codes, rules, regulations, policy and statutes are “not the law”. Self v. Rhay, 61 Wn (2d) 261.
U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION - “Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation which would abrogate them.” –Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)
U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION – 1796 – “There, every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowman without his consent”. Cruden v. Neale, 2 N.C. 338 (1796) 2 S.E. This decision has never been overturned:
“There are no Judicial courts in America and have not been since 1789. “Judges” do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. – FRC v. GE, 281 U.S. 464 Keller v. Potomac Elec. Co., 261 U.S. 428 1 Stat. 138-178″.
“There have NOT been any “Judges” in America since 1789. There have only been Administrators. – FRC v. GE, 281 U.S. 464 Keller v. Potomac Elec. Co., 261 U.S. 428 1 Stat. 138-178″.
“The Supreme court has warned, “Because of what appears to be Lawful commands {Statutory Rules, Regulations and Codes- Ordinances and Restrictions} on the surface, many citizens, because of their respect for what appears to be law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights, due to ignorance…{deceptive practices, constructive fraud, barratry, legal plunder, conversion, and malicious prosecution in inferior administrative State courts}”. – United States v. Minker, 350 U.S. 179, 178,76, S.Ct. 281,L.Ed. 185 (1956).
“The Common Law is the real law, Supreme Law of the land. The codes, rules, regulations, policy and statutes are “not the law”. (Self v. Rhay, 61 Wn 2d 261), They are the law of government for internal regulations, not the law of man, in his separate but equel station and natural state, a sovereign foreign with respect to government generally.
”A concurrent or ‘joint resolution’ of legislature in not Law”, (Koenig v. Flynn, 258 N.Y. 292, 179 N.E. 705, 707: Ward v. State, 176 Okl. 368, 56 P.2d 136,137: State ex rel. Todd v Flynn, 7 Wash.2d 443, 110 P.2d 162,165).
"No state shall convert a liberty into a license, and charge a fee therefore." [Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105]
"If the State converts a rights (liberty) into a privilege, the citizen can ignore the license and fee, and engage in the right (liberty) with impunity." [Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, Alabama, 373 U.S. 262]
Reconsidering your attorney…
As a cornerstone of the legal profession in the United States, the Bar Association is often seen as a champion of justice and the rule of law. However, recent revelations have brought to light a disturbing truth - the Bar Association is not in compliance with the US Constitution and has sought, through its actions, to circumvent the Constitution entirely.
At the heart of the matter is the Bar Association's system of mandatory bar dues. Under this system, lawyers are required to pay fees to the Bar Association in order to practice law in their respective states. While the fees are ostensibly used to support the legal profession and improve the quality of legal services, they also represent a significant violation of the First Amendment rights of lawyers.
The US Supreme Court has long held that compulsory bar dues are only constitutional if they are used for "unmistakably germane" purposes, such as regulating the legal profession or improving the administration of justice. However, the Bar Association has used these funds to engage in political advocacy, support controversial causes, and lobby for policies that many lawyers may not agree with. This has resulted in many lawyers being forced to support political positions and policies that they do not agree with, in direct violation of their First Amendment rights.
Moreover, the Bar Association has sought to silence dissenting voices and stifle debate on these issues. Lawyers who speak out against the Bar Association's policies or challenge its authority have been subjected to retaliation and harassment, effectively silencing any opposition to its actions.
In light of these revelations, it is clear that the Bar Association is not in compliance with the US Constitution and has sought to route the Constitution entirely. It is time for lawyers and the public at large, regardless of their political beliefs or positions on controversial issues, to demand the disintegration of the ABA. Only by upholding the Constitution can we the people, and our judiciary truly champion justice and the rule of law in these united states.
@ABAesq, since you are presumed to know and understand the law... you DO know you're in open violation of title 18 USC 2385 , and also at major liability for a class action pursuant to title 18 USC 242 , in a mass deprivation of rights, don't you?
Do Executive Orders apply to me?
Executive orders are directives issued by the President of the United States that have the force of law but are subject to judicial review. They are used to set policy or implement laws, but their effectiveness in changing the behavior of state citizens can be limited. The reason for this is that executive orders can only be enforced by federal agencies, and these agencies do not have the authority to directly regulate the behavior of individual citizens or states.
For example, an executive order may direct a federal agency to withhold funding from a state that is not complying with a federal law or policy. However, the state can challenge the order in court, and a judge may rule that the order is unconstitutional or exceeds the President's authority. In addition, the federal government may face legal challenges from individual citizens or groups who believe that the order violates their rights or the Constitution.
Moreover, states have their own sovereignty and can enact their own laws and regulations. This means that an executive order issued by the federal government may not be applicable or enforceable in a particular state. For instance, a state could choose to ignore an executive order on immigration and continue to provide sanctuary to undocumented immigrants.
while executive orders can be a powerful tool for the President to set policy and implement laws, their effectiveness in changing the behavior of individual citizens or states can be limited due to constitutional constraints, legal challenges, and state sovereignty.
Additional Resources
Sources related to human rights treaties, declarations, and other instruments. For example, we have the Declaration of Independence, the Report of the Commission on Unalienable Rights, and the Statute of Frauds. These websites provide valuable resources for anyone interested in learning more about human rights.
SITES CONTAINING SOURCES OF HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES, DECLARATIONS, AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS
King James Bible (officialKJB)
Black’s Law Dictionary (West Publishing co.)
The Constitution for the United States of America (archives.gov)
Statute of frauds (investopedia)
Self-Evident Truth (obcl.edu)
‘Endowed by their creator’ (constitutingamerica)
Declaration of Independence (archive.gov)
Report of the Commission on Unalienable Rights (state.gov)
Marbury v Madison (archives.gov)
Why a Constitution? (whitehouse.gov)
All laws must comply with the US Constitution or they are VOID– (patriots4truth.org)
State by State Comparison Of Remedy by Citizens for Crimes (dropbox.com)
Retroactivity of Constitutional Law (cupdf.com)
Emoluments clause official citation (congress.gov)
LAWYERS AND ATTORNEYS ARE NOT LICENSED TO PRACTICE LAW (freedom school)
BAR Attorneys, foreign agents? Court filing of incompetence (scribd)
Writ of Quo Warranto, 'By What Authority?' (pogo.org)
State Citizenship vs US Citizenship (ConstitutionalCommando)
Birth Certificate is a certificate of equity (archive.org)
Pyramids of Power (Training360)
Making sense of sensemaking (youtube)
COFFEE IS MONEY?
How our Telecomms are compromised, The Ericsson Report
The Ericsson Report (En Espanol!)
Editor’s Note
“In the course of assembling these facts and citations, it has become glaringly clear that God has a place in the law, and that He sits at the top of it. Revivalism, both in faith, as well as in constitutionality, is truly at the heart of what is needed in American society today. Contained herein are powerful facts and citations I have come across in my studies, as well as the greatest mentors on law and the constitution I can offer you. Please take the time to thoroughly review the resources provided and share this with your friends and family whenever possible, so that they may have an opportunity to diligently examine these facts as well. For years ‘they’ have used fourth branch mockingbird media and Hollywood to perpetuate the Big Lie, Perhaps now its time we mobilize to counter their tactics in similar fashion, and this time, we tell the Big Truth. The people need to step back into their power, and collectively call God and the Supreme and common Law back into form, to drive out the agents of iniquity, and deliver America back into one nation, under God, with liberty and justice for all.”
This is a work in progress, thank you for your patience as we construct a cogent itinerary. As ever, reversing the narrative on the constitutionality of things proves itself riddled with misinformation and perils, thus, I remain on the prowl for resources, mentors, facts and citations. Paid subscribers can use the comment section below to add any notes, suggestions, or additional material which should be attached to this post.
-Esquire, Founder of PoliticsGuilded
Like what we do? Consider sharing some abundance via our CashApp.
Humbly accepting donations via
Something to read more than once 👍
Thanks for taking the time to read this!
If you found the information helpful, please, share it.
If you have any resources you think should be added, please comment them below!